Main theme of my City Creatures essay:
From Thoreau environmentalists have inherited an inclination
to inspect matters from the periphery — the perspective of cordial criticism —
as Thoreau did from the vantage of Walden Pond on the outskirts of Concord. The
environmental tradition has also inherited a regard for inquiring into
necessities, now translated arguably into sustainability studies, a disposition
toward minute inspections of the workings of nature, and an amplified sense of
the affiliation between people and the wild, even if Thoreau had, at times, a
tendency to view his neighbors with a jaundiced eye. In other ways, though, the
environmental tradition has veered from Thoreau’s path. Though it is true that
Thoreau famously walked out of town, finding, he declared, little of interest
in that direction, nevertheless, Walden Pond is no glacial wilderness, it was
merely a walk away from home, from town, and from the neighbors. An ecology of
the urban environment had to wait for well over a century to emerge, even
though in some respects Thoreau’s Walden is the first volume of suburban
ecology. He provided, by way of illustration, detailed notes on the domestic
cat who appeared quite at home in the woods. Perhaps the most significant
departure from Thoreau’s legacy, however, is the bewitchment, in the modern
times, with the ecologically exotic, the cultivation of uncommon experience and
the infatuation with the rare. Rarity, of course, is the appropriate focus for
conservation biology, since rarity is an excellent predictor of vulnerability
to extinction. That being said, Thoreau’s genius for the ordinary may be worth
emulating. In the “Brute Neighbors” chapter in Walden, he described a
relentless battle between two species of ants, the sort of violent encounter
that is infrequently observed and almost never recorded though, presumably,
occurs all the time. What Thoreau’s account suggests is that if we look closely
enough we find that the rich dramas of nature are right at our feet, even if
this place is not very ecologically distinguished. One does not need to
peregrinate in remote parts to give witness to the marvelous.
I am not especially concerned in what follows with
reinvigorating a Thoreauvian approach to ecology. I simply want to suggest that
right here, under our noses in the towns and cities where most of us live these
days, there exist ordinary marvels if we only know where and how to look for
them. There is, let me suggest, another form of rarity - rarity of experience,
and a poverty in our attention, that may not be fatal but that is unfortunate
and consequential. O nova can serve as a mascot for this different form of
rarity: it is common but unfamiliar. That most have not seen it is by virtue
of its cryptic nature forgivable, but that despite its ubiquity most, I
suspect, know little about this species, needs rectification.
Outline of the full essay is here.
Outline of the full essay is here.
